Skip to Main Content.

Banking & Financial Disputes

We represent banks, private lenders, fiduciaries and other financial institutions and services providers in complex disputes that affect their operations, customer relationships and reputations. Our litigators focus on practical, business-minded strategies designed to resolve matters efficiently, limit exposure and position clients for success in court, arbitration, regulatory proceedings or negotiated resolution.

Our experience spans disputes involving deposit and payment operations, commercial lending, workouts and foreclosures, fraud and negotiable instruments, fiduciary and trust-related claims, consumer finance litigation, broker-dealer matters and bank regulatory enforcement. We understand the speed, sensitivity and documentation demands that often accompany banking disputes, and we work with clients from the outset to identify the key facts, preserve leverage and pursue the most effective path forward.

Key Contacts

Jonathan S. Liss Profile Image
Jonathan S. Liss

Partner

Newark, NJ

Philadelphia, PA

Cory J. Skolnick
Cory J. Skolnick

Partner

Louisville, KY

Jared M. Tully
Jared M. Tully

Partner

Charleston, WV

Daniel S. Weinberger Profile Image
Daniel S. Weinberger

Partner

New York, NY

How We Help Clients

Areas of Focus

Our banking disputes experience includes the following areas:

  • Commercial workouts, collection, foreclosure, receiverships, and lender liability defense
  • Defense of state and federal securities fraud claims
  • Regulatory compliance and litigation of both one-off and class action statutory claims
    (e.g., EFTA, FDCPA, FCRA, RESPA, TILA, and UCC matters)
  • Corporate governance and control
  • Deposit operations and fraud
  • Electronic and check payments disputes
  • Privacy and data security
  • Uniform Commercial Code, negotiable instruments and banking statutes
  • Title insurance defense and coverage matters
  • Trust, probate, and other fiduciary litigation
  • FINRA arbitrations and other broker-dealer matters

Representative Experience

Representative matters include high-stakes disputes and proceedings for banks and financial services clients involving fiduciary claims, payment and deposit issues, loan enforcement, regulatory scrutiny and related securities or broker-dealer issues.

Some notable representations include:

  • Obtained a defense award in a AAA arbitration on behalf of a bank in a $3.7 million fiduciary-duty claim involving allegations that the bank’s trust and investment management department over-concentrated an irrevocable trust’s multi-million-dollar portfolio in market-linked structured notes and other investments.
  • Represented financial services clients in disputes arising from deposit operations, payment processing, account ownership, wire transfers, negotiable instruments, business email compromise schemes and related fraud claims.
  • Handled disputes involving Uniform Commercial Code Articles 3, 4 and 4A, including negotiable instrument controversies, electronic payment claims and customer or bank-side loss-allocation issues.
  • Represented creditors and lenders in commercial foreclosure actions, workouts, lien-priority disputes and related real estate litigation, including experience handling eight-figure commercial foreclosure matters.
  • Defended banks and financial services providers in individual and class claims arising from lending transactions, foreclosure, repossession, bankruptcy and collection actions, mortgage-related litigation, overdrafts, fraud and other consumer finance issues.
  • Represented financial institutions and consumer finance clients in investigations, examinations and enforcement proceedings involving state attorneys general, state financial protection agencies, the CFPB, FTC, FDIC and OCC, including matters involving mortgage, money-transmitter and consumer-finance licensing issues.
  • Defended broker-dealer clients in FINRA arbitrations involving financial products, account administration, securities-related claims and alleged transaction errors, including matters in which claimants sought multi-million-dollar damages.
  • Represented a foreign commercial bank in a $60 million conversion claim relating to the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy.

Related Insights

placeholder image
Why Use Appellate Counsel Before Trial?

September 21, 2026 | Publications

Is it ever appropriate to use appellate counsel before trial? Experience teaches that many clients, ...

A man in a dark suit and teal tie is smiling within a blue circular frame on a white background.
placeholder image
FBT Gibbons Chairman Robert Sartin Discusses California Growth Strategy with The Recorder

August 5, 2026 | In the News

The Recorder profiles FBT Gibbons’ California growth strategy, quoting Chairman Robert Sartin on t...

Supreme Court Clarifies Induced Infringement Standard for Generic Drugs in Patent Disputes

July 29, 2026 | Publications

Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc., 608 U.S. ___ (June 4, 2026) In Hikma Pharmace...

U.S. Cybersecurity and Hacking Threats
Supreme Court Narrows Contributory Copyright Liability for Internet Service Providers in Cox Communications v. Sony

July 25, 2026 | Publications

Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment, 607 U.S. ___ (March 25, 2026) Earlier this yea...

Supreme Court Expansively Construes Removal Basis for State Suits Under Federal Officer Removal Statute

July 24, 2026 | Publications

Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Par., Louisiana, 608 U.S. ___ (April 17, 2026)  In Chevron USA Inc....

Removal Cannot Remove a Mistake: Supreme Court Rules Erroneous Dismissal of Nondiverse Defendant Does Not Cure Jurisdictional Defect

July 23, 2026 | Publications

Hain Celestial Group, Inc. v. Palmquist, 607 U.S. 421 (Feb. 24, 2026) On February 24, 2026, the U.S....

A healthcare professional in scrubs is focused on a task while monitoring information on a medical screen in a clinical setting.
An Erie Development in Professional Liability Litigation? Supreme Court Ruling Limits Reach of State Law Requirements in Federal Court

July 22, 2026 | Publications

Berk v. Choy, 607 U.S. 187 (Jan. 20, 2026) Affidavit of merit requirements have long served a gateke...

Stand(ing) in the Place Where You Live: Who Has Standing to Challenge DMA Abandonment After the Mineral Interest Changes Hands?

July 21, 2026 | Publications

If a surface owner records an affidavit of abandonment and a marginal notation under R.C. 5301.56, c...

Sorry, No Extensions: Supreme Court’s Strict Construction of the Civil Removal Statute Under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)(1)

July 21, 2026 | Publications

Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel, 608 U.S. ___ (April 22, 2026) In Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel, the U...

Stay ahead of the law.

Subscribe to receive email updates and choose your topics.