Ethan’s practice concentrates in the defense of mass tort and individual product liability cases involving pharmaceutical products, medical devices, and toxic substances. His experience includes cases involving prescription drugs (including gastrointestinal motility medication, acne medication, hormone replacement products, bisphosphonates, and anti-psychotics) and medical devices such as laparoscopic and endoscopic surgical equipment, hip and knee replacement devices, trocars, and medical sterilizing solutions. He has also handled toxic tort cases, defending against claims of exposure to benzene, silica, and asbestos (for both “traditional asbestos” products and talcum powder products). Mr. Stein has participated in a national counsel capacity in representing the manufacturer of asbestos–containing friction products, where he coordinated the client’s nationwide discovery efforts, and served as the liaison for dozens of local counsel throughout the United States. He has also litigated individual asbestos cases in New Jersey and New York for worksite premises owners, consumer-product retailers, and manufacturers of asbestos containing friction products, valves, pumps, and protective clothing. Many of these matters involved wrongful death claims with significant medical and scientific issues relating to pulmonology, epidemiology, pathology, and industrial hygiene. Ethan also had the benefit of working in-house on a temporary basis at a major client of the firm, where he was involved with such matters as drafting commercial agreements and product warranties, handling product-related claims, and working with the company’s outside counsel on employment, workers’ compensation, environmental, and intellectual property matters.
Ethan joined Gibbons in 2004, after spending over eight years litigating products liability matters at Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP and its predecessor firm, Shanley & Fisher.
Representative Cases
Housley v. Wave Energy Systems, Inc., et al., 343 N.J. Super. 574 (App. Div. 2001) (Appellate Court affirms grant of summary judgment in favor of manufacturer of medical sterilizing solution, based on principles of federal preemption, where product was subject to overlapping regulatory jurisdiction between FDA and EPA).
Fordham University School of Law, J.D.
Princeton University, A.B.
State of New Jersey
State of New York
State of Rhode Island
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York,
Included on the New York Metro Super Lawyers list, Personal Injury – Products: Defense